The Life of the Mind 3: Newcomb’s Paradox

A person is playing a game operated by the Predictor, an entity somehow presented as being exceptionally skilled at predicting people’s actions. Predictor’s predictions are “almost certainly” correct.
The player of the game is presented with two boxes, one transparent (labeled A) and the other opaque (labeled B). The player is permitted to take the contents of both boxes, or just the opaque box B. Box A contains a visible $1,000. The contents of box B, however, are determined as follows: At some point before the start of the game, the Predictor makes a prediction as to whether the player of the game will take just box B, or both boxes. If the Predictor predicts that both boxes will be taken, then box B will contain nothing. If the Predictor predicts that only box B will be taken, then box B will contain $1,000,000.
By the time the game begins, and the player is called upon to choose which boxes to take, the prediction has already been made, and the contents of box B have already been determined. That is, box B contains either $0 or $1,000,000 before the game begins, and once the game begins even the Predictor is powerless to change the contents of the boxes. Before the game begins, the player is aware of all the rules of the game, including the two possible contents of box B, the fact that its contents are based on the Predictor’s prediction, and knowledge of the Predictor’s infallibility. The only information withheld from the player is what prediction the Predictor made, and thus what the contents of box B are. Question: do you take two boxes or one box?

Check out other work in the Life Of The Mind series here.

The Social Unit 3: Choice

Choice is a more complicated thing than is often thought. One hears that market transactions are voluntary and therefore reflect each actor’s preference or choice. What is clear to me is that we have many preferences that often conflict. Example, one chooses to maintain one’s health and eat the cookie on the counter. I think of these preferences loosely as shorter term and longer term. The markets I am used to are very responsive to shorter term preferences. Leading to the question, how might current markets be structured to better balance the totality (often conflicting) of one’s preferences? And, are there any other methods of distribution preferential to markets?

Check out all the work in the collection: The Social Unit

The Story of Discourse 2: Descartes’ Demon

Descartes’ Demon is a maker of dreams and illusions. He has made your world, keeping you from his world. He must at times be sad that he cannot join his beautiful, sad, dramatic creation; or at least wonder why he has no monster to relieve him of the monotony of pure being. You have different problems though. You are stuck with his illusion, but you can choose to live it as life or as a lie. Do not anguish too much over your choice. Skepticism being what it is there might not be much difference.

Collection of Oddities: Sweet Talk the Hot Box 2: To the Virgins, to Make Much of Time

Gather ye rose-buds while ye may,
Old Time is still a-flying;
And this same flower that smiles today
Tomorrow will be dying.

The glorious lamp of heaven, the sun,
The higher he’s a-getting,
The sooner will his race be run,
And nearer he’s to setting.

That age is best which is the first,
When youth and blood are warmer;
But being spent, the worse, and worst
Times still succeed the former.

Then be not coy, but use your time,
And while ye may, go marry;
For having lost but once your prime,
You may forever tarry.

Check out other posts from Sweet Talk The Hot Box here.

The Life of the Mind 2: Inequality

You have two groups of people. The people in group A have $1,000 each and the people in group B have $1,000,000 each. The only options available to you are to take away money from people in group B, so they each have $1,000, or to do nothing. Which would be the better course of action?

Check out other work in the Life Of The Mind series here.

The Social Unit 2: Boundaries

Many of a social unit’s most difficult moral questions occur at physical and temporal boundaries. Those members coming to be, those members that will be, those that live among us, but aren’t full members. Who should we induct as members, how many, who should we exile, what protections do we offer them? And what do we owe the members of other social units that we so drastically affect?

Check out all the work in the collection: The Social Unit

The Story of Discourse 1: Wittgenstein’s Ladder

Wittgenstein’s ladder is a one-way ladder. Climbing it is difficult but descent is impossible. Once you have reached the top, there is a popular misconception that the ladder blocks your regress by casting itself down on the ground. However, ladder cognoscenti know that the ladder is much too subtle and elegant for that. The way it works is you can mount the ladder to return to the ground, but as you start to lower yourself, the ladder moves up at the same rate. The cumulative effect is null. The ladder has borne you up, and will now bear you exactly where you are for eternity.

The Life of the Mind 1: The Ship of Theseus

“The ship wherein Theseus and the youth of Athens returned from Crete had thirty oars, and was preserved by the Athenians down even to the time of Demetrius Phalereus, for they took away the old planks as they decayed, putting in new and stronger timber in their place, in so much that this ship became a standing example among the philosophers, for the logical question of things that grow; one side holding that the ship remained the same, and the other contending that it was not the same.”
Plutarch, Theseus

Check out other work in the Life Of The Mind series here.

Demonstrations 11: Wright and Nott

That Wright is Wright and Nott is Nott
Logicians must concede.
That Nott is right and Wright is not
Four judges have decreed.
That Nott is right, and Wright is not,
We all must now agree;
Then Nott is right and Wright is Nott,
The same thing, to a t.
If Nott is Nott and Wright is Nott,
It comes without a wrench
That we have not, if not two Notts,
Five judges on the bench.
If only four, as shown before,
And three agree with Nott,
The judgment is unanimous,
And Wright’s dissent is naught.
The knot is not, is Nott not Nott?
But is Wright right, or Nott?
Is Nott not right? What right has Wright
To write that Nott is not?
He concluded, “Do I do right to write to Wright
This most unrighteous rot?”

(I found this somewhere. I can’t remember where.)

Check out other posts from Demonstrations here.

Uncollected 29, Dan Pharo

Dan Pharo, King of Eygpt,
lives where motley is born.
The tackle of ornaments,
Mod yeatspeare gone.
And my line?
Fill a bucket with a hole.
Catches me on the corny.
On the weary.
Crowd dearer,
if I’m the solution,
what could the problem be.
We bleed our enemies
to give them their senses,
Dan Pharo said.

Essaying the Outline 28, W.O.G

That’s W.O.G. We say W.O.G wrath of God

  1. It’s a timespender, boyful thoughts

    1. The thoughts of youth are long thoughts

    2. The youth of thoughts are thoughts long

    3. And what else? Just long

  2. Can’t else? Written: do not send me back to this world

  3. Controler 8, we still have a Leo.

Check out other work in Essaying the Outline series here.

Essaying the Outline 24, The F-shaped Hole of Swears

The F-Shaped Whole of Swears

  1. the dream of a bedwetter.

    1. figure 1: the jockstrap of death

      1. snarl, what’s a tangle? ouch

    2. the mania of wealth is preservation

    3. figure 2: abrasive caffine whiskers

    4. thinking: kiss me, please don’t kiss me

    5. addendum (waking): Fat pants for Maria, Fat pants for Maria!

  2. The figure of one, a bonaman

    1. I phoenix the birds. oh, burn!

    2. what’s the only argument for the same result?

    3. dear Sorry I’m blanking

  3. I once went to prom with a Bill named Tom

    1. was like a Latin Zorro

    2. said: fare thee asshole to the cafe spiders

    3. said: pitting the ice, silver toe?

    4. he wrote at my feet so I could read off my shoes.

    5. just say “Plumbago”

    6. now think carefully, is parking lots for parking lots?

  4. Till the -oom and -oom find gl- and d-

    1. sama the goly host

    2. Greek, Greek, and more Greek

    3. her mouth was the f-shaped hole of swears

    4. say hello to my slobbering heart

    5. Canchya

      1. conchya

      2. wontchya

      3. dontchya

    6. No, I just said cantchya

Check out other work in Essaying the Outline series here.